THE OBSERVATIONAL APPROACH TO
COSMOLOGY
Most of the theoretical investigators adopt this point of view, and accept without question the
interpretation of red-shifts as velocity-shifts. They are fully justified in their position until evidence to
the contrary is forthcoming. But these lectures will present a remarkable situation. The familiar
interpretation of red-shifts seems to imply a strange and dubious universe, very young and very small.
On the other hand, the plausible and, in a sense, familiar conception of a universe extending indefinitely
in space and time, a universe vastly greater than the observable region, seems to imply that red-shifts are
not primarily velocity-shifts.
In view of this possible conflict, whether of facts or theories or speculations, the observer is inclined to
keep an open mind and to adopt parallel working hypotheses for the interpretation of his explorations.
He may assume, first, that red-shifts are velocity-shifts, or, secondly, that red-shifts result from some
unknown principle that does not involve actual motion, and always, of course, he will search for some
empirical, critical test for distinguishing between the two assumptions, between motion and no motion.
https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/Sept04/Hubble/paper.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment Form Message